Protecting Your Right
to a Safe and Healthful Workplace

SEARCH THIS SITE!
 
Enclose exact phrases in double quotes ("....") to narrow your search results.

NYCOSH Home Page

About NYCOSH

How NYCOSH Can Help

NYCOSH Calendar of Events

Basic Health & Safety Rights

Workers' Compensation

Strategies for Safer Workplaces

How to File a Health & Safety Complaint

Health & Safety Laws & Regulations

Hazards

Links & Resources

[http://www.nycosh.org/Update10_July-Sept_2001.html]

NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health Archive
July - September 2001

The Update on Safety and Health is published every two weeks by NYCOSH.  Scroll down to see the contents of each issue.  If you would like a free subscription to the biweekly NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health, click here and then click on "send."

To browse the table of contents of all issues (including those published before July 2001), click here.


NYCOSH UPDATE
 September 27, 2001

In response to a large number of questions from unions and workers about compensation for victims of the events of September 11, NYCOSH has prepared this factsheet, which lists the major compensation programs and explains who is eligible for each of them. If you know anyone is in any of these groups, please pass the information along to them.

Who is eligible for government compensation as a result of the World Trade Center catastrophe?

  • Anyone who lost time from work because of an injury or needed medical care for an injury resulting from the attack
  • Anyone who lost time from work because of emotional trauma or needed medical care for emotional trauma resulting from the attack
  • The dependents of anyone who was killed in the attack
  • Anyone who lost personal property as a result of the attack or whose property was damaged
  • Anyone whose residence or place of business must be cleaned or repaired before it can be used normally


NYCOSH UPDATE
 September 17, 2001

Special issue: The Catastrophe at the World Trade Center

Right now thousands of workers are involved in heroic recovery and clean-up operations at the site of the World Trade Center and in the surrounding area. The New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH) has received many questions from workers, unions and Lower Manhattan residents about the safety and health hazards that they may be exposed to, including contaminated air and the danger of communicable disease.

This factsheet provides a description of some of the potential hazards and an outline of ways that workers and managers can minimize some of the hazards.

To obtain additional information about these and other hazards and methods of protecting safety and health, please contact any of the organizations listed on the last page of the factsheet.

For additional information about safety and health in the aftermath of the catastrophe at the World Trade Center, click here.



NYCOSH UPDATE
 September 7, 2001

The 825 most dangerous workplaces in New York State

Last month the U.S. Labor Department and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration released a list of nearly 14,000 employers in the U.S. with excessively high injury rates.

There are 825 New York State employers on the list, 5.9 percent of the total. Each of the listed employers had a lost-workday-injury-and-illness (LWDII) rate of at least eight per hundred workers, compared to a national average LWDII of three. The data is from 1999, the most recent available.

At the same time OSHA released the names of the employers, it sent a letter to each of them explaining that "employees in your business are being injured at a higher rate than in most other businesses in the country," and stating: "OSHA recognizes that an elevated LWDII rate does not necessarily indicate a lack of interest in safety and health on the part of your business. Whatever the cause, however, a high rate is costly to your company in both personal and financial terms."

The list does not include employers in the construction, agriculture and mining industries, which have LWDII rates that are significantly higher than general industry.

This is the third year that OSHA has compiled and released a list of general-industry employers with excessive LWDII rates.

Of the 825 New York State employers on the list, 221, or 27 percent, are nursing homes. The disproportionate presence of nursing homes on the list is due to the industry's overall LWDII rate that is 2-1/2 times the average for general industry. Approximately one-third of all the nursing homes in New York State are on OSHA's list.

Wholesale merchandise operations are the second largest group, making up 11.8 percent of the list, followed by fabricated metal products manufacturing (8.1 percent), food production (7.5 percent) and trucking and warehousing at 6 percent.

Several employers or franchise operations appear repeatedly, including 13 United Parcel Service facilities, 13 Pepsi-Cola bottlers, 12 Coca-Cola bottlers, and nine Federal Express offices. Each of those employers had similarly large numbers of workplaces included in last year's list.

Employers in New York City, Long Island and Westchester make up 23 percent of the list, with 96 in New York City, 72 on Long Island and 20 in Westchester.

Click here for the list of 825 New York State employers, arranged both by zip code and by type of business. The lists posted in previous years are also available there, as is a link to the OSHA website's national list of 14,000 employers.

-- From the September 7, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
John Henshaw takes charge of OSHA

In early August the Bush administration's choice to head OSHA, John Henshaw, breezed through a Senate confirmation hearing that lasted less than an hour. Despite their having fought a bitter battle over the repeal of the OSHA ergonomics standard six months earlier, members of the Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee allowed Henshaw to sidestep all questions about ergonomics and any other controversies over OSHA policy.

Several senators expressed dissatisfaction with developments at OSHA, including Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), who took the opportunity to tell Henshaw "a number of us remain concerned about the roll-back of the ergonomics regulation," but none pressed for any specific commitments by the nominee. Henshaw, who was the only witness in the brief proceeding, emphasized his many years of experience as corporate safety official and his belief in "forceful and fair enforcement."

Without any appearance of opposition, Henshaw's nomination was approved unanimously by the committee. The next day the full Senate confirmed him without dissent.

The lack of controversy surrounding Henshaw's confirmation reflects satisfaction with his nomination on the part of major unions, employers and organizations of safety and health specialists, such as the American Industrial Hygiene Association and the American Society of Safety Engineers.

AFL-CIO Safety and Health Director Peg Seminario describes Henshaw as "a competent and widely respected safety and health professional who's got a lot of experience in the field," an opinion echoed by Scott Schneider, Safety and Health Director for the Laborers' Health and Safety Fund of North America, who told NYCOSH: "Henshaw is a professional who is genuinely concerned about the health and safety of workers. I think he's fair and willing to listen to workers and unions." The U.S. Chamber of Commerce's director of labor law policy, Peter Eide says "I think he's got the right approach."

But amidst his widespread acceptance, safety and health activists also expressed concern about the possibility the new OSHA Administrator might attempt to lead the agency in a direction that lacks any legal basis and is widely opposed by organized labor.

Such concern is based on Henshaw's 26 years as a safety manager and safety director of the giant chemical manufacturer Monsanto and its recent spin-off, Astaris. Both companies have been deeply involved in a controversial method of occupational safety and health policy known as "behavior-based safety" (BBS).

BBS is the target of sharp criticism from many safety and health activists, who see it as putting the focus of safety and health programs on the prevention of "unsafe acts," instead of focusing on eliminating conditions that could give rise to injury or illness. As such, they argue, BBS is incompatible with one of the basic tenets of occupational safety and health policy, the hierarchy of controls.

According to the principle of the hierarchy of controls, which forms the basis of most OSHA regulations, the fundamental method of enhancing occupational safety is to design processes and equipment to eliminate or minimize hazards. BBS techniques, on the other hand, focus on making modifications to the behavior of workers, not making modifications to the design of the production process. Many labor activists regard the BBS emphasis on behavior as being contradictory to the primary need to focus on using the techniques of engineering to eliminate circumstances that could cause injuries or near misses.

BBS proponents insist that their program must be used in conjunction with the hierarchy of controls, but many activists say that, in practice, the two approaches are not compatible with each other. "When companies spend their money to hire psychologists and other BBS experts instead of safety engineers, it shifts the entire focus of a safety program onto worker behavior," says one union official, who requested anonymity "Even the head of OSHA can't legally substitute BBS for the hierarchy of controls, but OSHA doesn't have a dime to spare, so any resources that are diverted to BBS-related training or to funding BBS techniques means cutting the budget for activity that actually promotes safety and health," the official adds.

Less than a month after taking office, Henshaw embarked on a policy initiative that has the potential to divert OSHA resources from enforcement efforts, when he and Labor Secretary Elaine Chao announced on Aug. 27 that the Bush administration had decided to support legislation that would have the effect of amending the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The change they seek is to write into the law the agency's Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) – which has been governed by agency regulations and not statute since its inception 19 years ago.

Henshaw and the Bush administration are backing a bill (HR 2235) that would write VPP into law. As the bill is written, the change in VPP's status would be innocuous, but there is nothing to prevent the legislature from amending the bill to codify employer-friendly policies are not consistent with existing law. An AFL-CIO spokesperson told NYCOSH that the federation had not taken a position on the legislation in its present form, "but we would vigorously oppose any legislation that would have an adverse impact on our members or other workers."

During his first month in office Henshaw has not been reported to have made any explicit references to the role of BBS in OSHA policy, but some observers see hints of a move toward BBS in such statements as his August 23 remark about the need for tighter enforcement to reduce the fatality rate in the construction industry. We "may have reached a plateau," on construction fatalities, he told reporters. As a result, he added, "we may need to find a different way to approach it."

-- From the September 7, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
New York City Republican mayoral candidates mum on ergonomic protection for city workers

Last April NYCOSH wrote to all the announced major-party candidates for mayor of New York City to ask whether they would support city regulations that would provide the employees of the City with protections similar to those in the federal ergonomics standard that was repealed by congressional Republicans in March.

At the time, there were four announced candidates, all Democrats. All four responded with detailed letters outlining their commitment to protecting city workers from ergonomic hazards. Click here for a complete report of their responses.

Shortly after the letters to the four announced candidates went out, two more major-party candidates put their hats in the ring, Herman Badillo and Michael Bloomberg, both Republicans. In an effort to learn, and publicize the views of all the candidates on ergonomics, on July 12 NYCOSH wrote to Badillo and Bloomberg, posing the same question to them: "If you are elected, will you implement a program to reduce ergonomic hazards for New York City workers?"

Neither of the Republican candidates has responded to NYCOSH's letter. Except for staff members of both candidates' having signed a form indicating they received the letters, neither candidate has even acknowledged having been asked the question.

-- From the September 7, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
New York City officials plead ignorance when asked ‘How much does New York City spend to provide medical care to injured municipal workers and to compensate them for lost time?'

There is no dispute among safety and health experts that one essential method to protect workers from occupational injury and illness is to collect and analyze information about the nature and causes of injuries and illnesses that members of a workforce experience.

New York City is one of the largest employers in the U.S., with a budget for workers' compensation expenditures that dwarfs the entire municipal payrolls of most of the municipalities in the U.S. But, NYCOSH recently learned, the City does not collect and analyze that information, nor can it even summarize the broad outlines of its workers' compensation experience, such as the number of workers who lose time from work, the cost of their medical care and the cost of compensating them for lost time.

NYCOSH discovered the City's complete ignorance about the prevalence and cost of municipal workers' injuries and illnesses in July, when the City responded to a Freedom of Information Law request for detailed information about the City's workers' compensation program with a letter stating it did not have access to any of the requested information.

NYCOSH filed an appeal of the City's response. On Aug. 14 the City denied the appeal, while reiterating its position: It does not have access to the requested information, neither the details nor a summary, about the nature of the injuries and illnesses that result in City workers filing workers' compensation claims or about the costs the City incurs as a result.

-- From the September 7, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Growing Pains: NYCOSH website improves information access with search engine

When the NYCOSH website added its 120th page in August, it had grown beyond the point of navigability using only its site map. To make it possible to find the information that might otherwise elude website visitors, a search engine has been added. Visitors will find it at the upper left corner of the home page and other frequently visited pages.

-- From the September 7, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Save the date! NYCOSH awards celebration Thursday, December 13

NYCOSH will honor three individuals and a union for their outstanding contributions to the development of occupational safety and health over the last year:

  • Peg Seminario, Health and Safety Director of the AFL-CIO, in special recognition of her dedication to the promulgation of an ergonomics standard
  • Stuart Appelbaum, President of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union and Chair, New York State AFL-CIO Safety and Health Committee
  • Eric Frumin, Health and Safety Director of Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, will receive the NYCOSH Karen Silkwood Award
  • Professional Staff Congress, NYSUT, AFT, will receive the NYCOSH Union Recognition Award

The ceremony will take place in Manhattan at the Cherkasky/Davis Conference Center of the National Benefit Fund beginning at 6pm. For tickets and information, contact Symona Johnson at 212-627-3900 ext. 10 or nycosh@nycosh.org.

-- From the September 7, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Job openings – New York State safety and health inspector and inspector trainee – September 10 application deadline!

The NYS Department of Civil Service is accepting applications for Safety and Health Inspector and Inspector Trainee positions with the Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Salary $31,555 - $36,392. Applications must be postmarked by September 10, 2001 for a October 13, 2001 Civil Service examination. For the complete announcement, including job description and responsibilities, qualifications and application procedures, or for other information contact Ruth Kvale, NYS Department of Labor Personnel Office, Room 555, State Campus Building 12, Albany NY 12240. Phone: 518-457-1220. E-mail: usfrg1@labor.state.ny.us or click here to view examination announcements 23-852 and 23-853.

For a selection of other safety and health job openings, click here to visit our Safety and Health Employment Opportunities page.

-- From the September 7, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org



NYCOSH UPDATE
 August 10, 2001

New York State Labor Department installs new safety and health leadership

Last month, after more than a year of acrimonious public criticism and strong expressions of federal disapproval, the New York State Labor Department replaced the director of its Public Employee Safety and Health Bureau (PESH). The change was greeted with applause from some of the agency's critics and with expressions of cautious optimism from others.

Labor Commissioner Linda Angello appointed veteran safety and health manager Maureen Cox to replace Robert Perez as PESH manager. Cox, who had been PESH manager during the tenure of Democratic Governor Mario Cuomo, was removed from that position shortly after Republican Gov. George Pataki was elected in 1994.

Angello appointed Cox to the post shortly after a high-level meeting with state union officials, including New York State AFL-CIO President Denis Hughes. A spokesperson for the state AFL-CIO told NYCOSH that Angello had agreed that there was a need to correct the enforcement shortcomings of PESH. "Very soon after AFL-CIO President Denis Hughes met with Commissioner Angello, we began to see things change for the better," said Arthur Wilcox, Director of the state AFL-CIO's public-sector division. "A new PESH director has been installed and we have resumed quarterly meetings between public-sector unions and PESH officials, meetings that had been a regular practice, but which were suspended by the Labor Department more than four years ago."

"Commissioner [Angello] has committed to strengthening the relationship between PESH and the organized labor movement of this state," said Public Employees Federation president Roger Benson, who is the co-chair of the New York State AFL-CIO's Public Employee Occupational Health and Safety Committee. Benson added, "the public employee unions have been protesting PESH deficiencies and will remain vigilant until they are corrected." PESH enforces safety and health regulations that apply to employees of state and local government in New York State.

Cox's appointment could represent a turning point for PESH, not only in its relations with organized labor, but also with the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Over the last two years OSHA released a series of scathing reports detailing major PESH failures to enforce safety and health regulations. OSHA, which is required to provide PESH with half of its budget, audits PESH enforcement efforts but lacks any authority to intervene directly in PESH activities.

OSHA officials expressed gratification at the appointment of Cox to head PESH. "We have worked with Maureen very successfully in the past," said OSHA Assistant Regional Administrator Brenda Judson, "and we know the strength of her commitment to making a success of the PESH program. We look forward to continuing that relationship."

Lee Clarke, safety and health director of one the state's largest public-sector unions, District Council 37 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, also expressed satisfaction at Cox's appointment. "I have already found that PESH is more responsive to us," she told NYCOSH. "Of course, the proof is in the pudding, and it is too early to draw any firm conclusions, but I am very hopeful that she will make sure that PESH functions the way it is supposed to."

Joel Shufro, executive director of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health, commented, "The appointment of Maureen Cox to head PESH clearly demonstrates how important it has been for the labor movement, working through the state AFL-CIO's Public Employee Occupational Health and Safety Committee, to intervene in what was becoming a disastrous situation. But the change will make a difference only if Commissioner Angello follows through by ensuring that the Labor Department takes its law-enforcement activities seriously," he added. "For years that has not been the case, and Cox cannot, by herself, turn the situation around. She certainly has the skill to do so, but her efforts will be fruitless if Angello and the Governor don't give her the backing and the resources she needs."

For more information about the crisis in PESH enforcement, click here.

-- From the August 10, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Five Percent of all fire-suppression sprinklers may be defective, but recall does not directly inform owners

When the Consumer Product Safety Commission and Central Sprinkler Co. announced the recall of some 35 million fire-suppression sprinkler heads last month, it was the third largest voluntary recall ever negotiated by a manufacturer and CPSC staff.

The recalled sprinklers, which account for some five percent of all the fire sprinklers installed in the U.S., have been found to deteriorate after installation. During recent tests, approximately 25% of them did not activate themselves in a fire, and safety engineers expect that their failure rate will increase with the passage of time.

An earlier fire sprinkler recall negotiated by the CPSC, which called for the replacement of some 8.4 million sprinklers with a similar defect, was called off after less than 60 percent of the defective sprinklers had been replaced, according to an attorney on the CPSC staff.

Under the terms of the voluntary recall, the manufacturer is not obliged to contact the owners of buildings where the sprinklers have been installed. NYCOSH urges the owners (and occupants, if necessary) of buildings where any sprinklers have been installed after 1988 to contact the installation contractor or the sprinkler recall hotline at 1-800-871-3492 to learn whether any sprinklers on the property are among those recalled.

-- From the August 10, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Asbestos in crayons a whopper of an urban legend? A Letter to the Editor that the New York Times saw not fit to print

Last week the New York Times weekly science section published an article debunking so-called "urban legends" such as cancer-causing deodorants and poisonous spiders that dwell under toilet seats. "Phony though the stories may be," reported the Times, "officials at government and private health organizations say they are increasingly having to field inquiries from people taken in by the latest medical hoax or rumor. ‘It always amazes me how many people believe some of these rumors without really investigating them,'' said Dr. Ted Gansler, director of medical content for the American Cancer Society's website'" according to the Times.

In an effort to set the victims of hoaxers straight, the Times included a short list of "whoppers," including "stories about asbestos in crayons."

It was a poor choice of examples, because the presence of asbestos in crayons is well documented. NYCOSH felt that the readers (and editors) of the Times ought to know the facts: many crayons contain talc that is contaminated with asbestos. The effect on the health of crayon users is unknown, but the asbestos-contaminated talc is known to have produced an epidemic of asbestos-related disease among workers in upstate New York talc mines and among residents of the talc-mining region. We submitted the following letter, which the Times did not publish.

To the Editor:

Phony stories about imaginary risks does indeed promote unfounded fears ("Toilet Spiders? Not Real, but Good for a Scare," July 31). But labeling truthful statements as phony promotes only unfounded feelings of safety.

It is a grave mistake to include in a list of such whoppers "stories about asbestos in crayons." There actually is asbestos in crayons, as the Consumer Product Safety Commission confirmed in its August 2000 "CPSC Staff Report on Asbestos Fibers in Children's Crayons."

In that report, CPSC stated: "Trace amounts of anthophyllite asbestos and larger amounts of other fibers (transitional fibers) were found in Crayola and Prang crayons.... The staff concludes that the risk a child would be exposed to the fibers through inhalation or ingestion of crayons containing asbestos and transitional fibers is extremely low...... Although the CPSC staff determined that the risk is extremely low, the staff believes that as a precaution, crayons should not contain these fibers." (The report is posted in the CPSC website at www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/Foia00/os/crayons.pdf)

The asbestos is in the crayons because crayon manufacturers and the mining companies that supply the asbestos-contaminated talc that goes into the crayons successfully promoted the hoax that the talc is free of asbestos. That whopper has resulted in exposing children to an "extremely low," but completely unnecessary risk. It has also resulted in the sickness and death of thousands of miners and other workers from asbestos-related disease, which could have been prevented if the hoaxers had not succeeded in suppressing the truth that the talc, and anything containing it, was inherently dangerous.

For more information about the health effects of asbestos, including the cover-up of its presence in talc, click here.

-- From the August 10, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Save the date! NYCOSH awards celebration Thursday, December 13

NYCOSH will honor three individuals and a union for their outstanding contributions to the development of occupational safety and health over the last year:

  • Peg Seminario, Health and Safety Director of the AFL-CIO, in special recognition of her dedication to the promulgation of an ergonomics standard
  • Stuart Appelbaum, President of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union and Chair, New York State AFL-CIO Safety and Health Committee
  • Eric Frumin, Health and Safety Director of Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, will receive the NYCOSH Karen Silkwood Award
  • Professional Staff Congress, NYSUT, AFT, will receive the NYCOSH Union Recognition Award

The ceremony will take place in Manhattan at the Cherkasky/Davis Conference Center of the National Benefit Fund beginning at 6pm. For tickets and information, contact Symona Johnson at 212-627-3900 ext. 10 or nycosh@nycosh.org.

-- From the August 10, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Job opening -- Senior construction safety and health research scientist for union organization

-- From the August 10, 2001 NYCOSH Update on Safety and Health
http://www.nycosh.org

This page was last updated on November 5, 2001.
     

Home | Health & Safety News | How NYCOSH Can Help | Calendar | Basic Health & Safety Rights
Workers' Compensation | Strategies for Safer Workplaces | How to File a Health & Safety Complaint
Health & Safety Laws & Regulations | Hazards | Links & Resources | Site Map
|
Employment Opportunities | 'The Clipping File'

Broken links? Comments or criticisms? Feedback? Suggestions for additions, new links?
Please e-mail webmanager@nycosh.org.

New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH)
275 7th Avenue, New York, NY 10001 --- tel: 212-627-3900; fax: 212-627-9812
email:
nycosh@nycosh.org --- web: http://www.nycosh.org

The New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH) grants permission to copy and/or distribute this information without charge for non-commercial or educational purposes if the information is kept intact and without alteration, and is credited to: "New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health http://www.nycosh.org".

NYCOSH is a tax-exempt educational foundation operating under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to NYCOSH are fully deductible from federal income tax.

NYCOSH is a union shop. The NYCOSH website is maintained by
members of the Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy workers union (PACE) Local 2-149.

Disclaimer.